Executive Extortion – America Held Hostage

Fearmonger Megalomania

Opinion by AAABTonto:

The Obama administration is holding the American people hostage. With the automatic sequester cuts looming, Obama has come out swinging … and whining and crying like a little spoiled baby. He can’t stand the idea of cutting spending in any measure. The cuts, which aren’t really cuts—they are a reduction in spending rates, amount to a whopping $84 billion. Half of that amount is attributed to defense spending, so we are talking about $42 billion, while we are still going to spend $3.6 trillion on everything else the President alleges to be a priority! $42 billion versus $3.6 trillion and the commander & cheat is having a conniption fit?

Weekly Address: Averting the Sequester and Finding a Balanced Approach to Deficit Reduction

Obama has fear-mongered this issue to the point of hysteria, claiming that police, firefighters and caregivers will be unable to provide services if the cuts are allowed to take place. But police, firefighters and caregivers are not on the federal payroll. Obama claims that jobs will be lost, meat inspectors will be furloughed, and the border patrol won’t be able to protect us (they aren’t allowed to detain anyone anyway).

CNN Freaks Out Over ‘Draconian’ Sequester Cuts, Like the ‘Asteroid’ [Video]

LaHood Sequester Will Lead to Flight Delays

In effect, what LaHood is saying here (video above), is that he and the Obama administration are in discussion with the air traffic controllers union to decide how and when to most effectively  inconvenience travelers in order to scare them into pressuring congress into smooching the President’s posterior and spending more and more taxpayer dollars. The President and his henchman go straight for the furloughing of air traffic controllers, the police, the firefighters and the meat inspectors as if they couldn’t find some other facet of public service to curb—like the Department of Acupuncture (sarcasm–however many state governments actually have departments which oversee Acupuncture). There are infinite locations within the federal leviathan where some modicum of efficiency could be exercised. This is extortion. This is the President of the United States trying to scare the public into believing that the world is going to end if the government has to curb even the tiniest amount of spending. Obama is delusional. The man is obsessed with spending and taxing.

This idea of the sequester was originated by the White House, even though they fervently deny it, and an article entitled Obama’s sequester deal-changer, by Bob Woodward in the Washington Post on Feb. 22, 2013 underscores this fact:

… The president and Lew had this wrong. My extensive reporting for my book “The Price of Politics” shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.

Obama personally approved of the plan for Lew and Nabors to propose the sequester to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). They did so at 2:30 p.m. July 27, 2011, according to interviews with two senior White House aides who were directly involved.

ICYMI: It Was Barack Obama Who Signed the Sequester into Law [Video]

Flashback: Obama Vows To Veto Any Effort To Undo Sequester Cuts [Video]

The President says that “Republicans still have an opportunity to do the right thing,” but the fact is that President needs to stop acting like the credit card has no limit. He needs to stop acting like a monarch—like the dictator of a banana republic in a third world hell-hole because that is where he is taking us.

This is the 5th time Republicans have had a fiscal standoff with the President and Obama still hasn’t signed a budget (as required by law) in over four years. Lying through his Marxist teeth, the President has tried to hang the sequester cuts around the necks of congress—namely Republicans. Obama blames Republicans (again) for trying to protect the 1% and avoiding tax increases. Obama got his damned tax increases; the only solution that Obama has for any problem is a damn tax increase! His tax increasing policies claim to only affect the “rich,” but the facts are demonstrably different (Tonto’s paycheck is smaller) and small businesses are further handicapped in an already vulnerable economy.

Barack Obama: You Just Can’t Cut Your Way to Prosperity – 2/5/13

Amazing – Obama Caught in Bald-Faced Lie on White House Sequester

Obama is a shameless liar; Boehner and the Republicans would behoove themselves to start pointing this out. The media lapdogs are never going to say anything nice about Republicans, so why be concerned about their propagandist opinion? Some offense is long overdue and making the President lay in the bed of his own making would a very good start.

Paul on Sequester Cuts: ‘It’s a Pittance’, Obama ‘Divorced From Any Reality’

Sequestration Ponzi Scheme [Video]

From the Rush Limbaugh Show:

February 21, 2013

RUSH:  Folks, I’m sorry here.  I can’t help but think that we are all being played for a bunch of fools, a bunch of suckers on this sequester business.  I don’t know.  Are you like me?  Do you really think 800,000 people are gonna lose their jobs in the Pentagon because we cut $22 billion?  Do you really think air traffic control’s gonna shut down?  Do you really think there aren’t gonna be any meat inspectors?  Do you really think that all of these horror stories are going to happen?  I don’t.

I feel like I’ve been here.  This is deja vu all over again.  I remember the 1995 budget battle.  That involved a legitimate government shut down.  That wasn’t just $22 billion we were not gonna spend.  We’re still gonna spend $3.5 trillion.  We’re just not gonna spend $22 billion, if it happens.

Now, the government shutdown in 1995, yeah, we were gonna starve kids.  That was the plan then.  I’m just kidding.  Snerdley I’m sorry, it’s all ridiculous to me.  Every bit of this.  I’ve been doing this — you get new perspective.  I’m into my 25th year, and I think I mentioned to you last week and maybe the week before, I’ve been doing this long enough now to start seeing the repeat cycles on everything.  I don’t care whether it’s the debt limit or the fiscal cliff or continuing resolution or the budget crisis of 2008 or TARP or the auto bailouts, and now the sequester, it’s the same playbook.

It is the same threats.  It’s the same danger.  It’s the same crisis.  It’s identical.  There’s nothing about it that changes, over and over.  And everybody gets sucked into it.  I try to escape, I try to get out of it, I try to leave it aside, I try to move on, but it just sucks me back in, too, until I realize that I have been sucked back in.  And then there’s a part of me that says, “Well, wait a minute now.”  You got not just Panetta, but now a uniformed military general, General Odierno, saying that he could lose 600,000 uniformed people, and the common sense of this doesn’t add up.  Now we’ve got a guy comparing this to the Oklahoma City bombing.


RUSH: Everything gets repeated. The cycle, the claims, the threats, the crisis, Armageddon, it’s the same. And we’re talking $22 billion. It’s not as though we’re not gonna spend anything. If the sequester happens, the first year is $44 billion. Half of that’s defense. We’re still going to spend $3.5 trillion or $3.3 trillion, even if we don’t spend the $22 billion. Then there’s this guy who draws an analogy to the Oklahoma City bombing.

Plus, we have our old buddy Ron Fournier. He used to be at AP, and is now at the National Journal. This is quite instructive, actually. Let me just read a portion of this to you. “You May Be Right, Mr. President, But This Is Crazy — Your federal government is almost certain to blow past the March 1 deadline for averting $1.2 trillion in haphazard budget cuts that could cost 700,000 jobs.” But see, it’s not $1.2 trillion.

It is over ten years, but it’s not this year and it’s not next year. This year’s portion of it is $22 billion. Besides, does anybody really think that, even if the sequester happens, it’s not gonna get fixed for ten years? Anyway… “Don’t worry. We know who to blame. President Obama makes a credible case that he has reached farther toward compromise than House Republicans.” He has? Well, I guess he has, since the media says so. “President Obama makes a credible case that he has reached farther toward compromise…”

“But knowing who’s at fault,” writes Mr. Fournier, “doesn’t fix the problem. To loosely quote Billy Joel: You may be right, Mr. President, but this is crazy. Is this fiscal standoff (the fifth since Republicans took control of the House in 2011)…” Is that not an interesting perspective, by the way? It’s not “the fifth standoff since Obama was inaugurated.” No, no. It’s “the fifth standoff since Republicans took control of the House” two years ago. “Is this fiscal standoff … just about scoring political points, or is it about governing?”

Unbeknownst to Mr. Fournier, he has now swerved right into my theory: Political points versus governing, and he says it’s all about politics. “If it’s all about politics, bully for Obama. A majority of voters will likely side with the president over Republicans in a budget dispute because of his popularity and the GOP’s pathetic approval ratings.” Speaking of that, I don’t want to depress you out there, but Obama’s approval rating is as high as it’s been since 2009. It’s 55%.

The Republicans’ approval is as low as it’s been since 2009. Chris Christie goes on Letterman, eats a doughnut, and he’s at 74% approval. Christie is at 74%. Obama is at 55%, his highest approval in four years. But then Mr. Fournier writes, “If it’s all about politics, bully for Obama” but “[i]f it’s about governing, the story changes” for Obama ” Yes, siree, Bob. That’s my whole point. “You see,” as Mr. Fournier writes, totally unaware that he’s totally confirming my brilliant theorem of last week, “If it’s about governing, then the story changes for Obama.”

Because “in any enterprise, the chief executive is ultimately accountable for success and failure. Sure, blame Congress — castigate all 535 lawmakers, or the roughly half you hate. But there is only one president. Even if he’s right on the merits, Obama may be on the wrong side of history. Fair or not, the president owns this mess.” Mr. Fournier, I disagree with you. He doesn’t. That is the whole point. The president does not own this mess. His approval rating wouldn’t be 55% if he owned this mess.

He is not governing, Mr. Fournier. You’ve stumbled into this and I’m here to alert you how right you are. You don’t even know it. He’s not governing. It’s all about politics. Congress is being blamed for this. The Republicans are being blamed. Obama is just the outsider trying to fix it all. He’s the guy trying to compromise. He even went out and played golf to try to compromise! He even went out and played golf with Tiger Woods to try to compromise, and still the Republicans resist.

“Fair or not, the president owns this mess.” He doesn’t own this mess. Even though it was his idea. Even though he will choose if the sequester happens where there are cuts. (He will choose it!) But as far as the low-information voter population in this country knows, he does not own this mess, Mr. Fournier, and he will not own it. The Republicans own this lock, stock, and barrel. But, Mr. Fournier writes, “What can he do about it? For starters, he could read this op-ed piece published two months ago in a Midwestern newspaper…”

Fournier highlights an op-ed written by a Republican who blames everybody on both sides for it and we all gotta get together and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. That’s what Fournier thinks Obama needs to read. “With a few tweaks, Obama could make it a presidential address. … ‘Americans are fed up with the jousting.… There is a lot of public posturing but apparently not much genuine conversation.'” That gets to the root of what’s bothering me here. The jousting never ends. I just feel like I’m being played for the fool here to get sucked into this narrative and this template every day.

The way all this stuff plays is, I think this whole episode is a big joke on the country. I think this is an insulting joke to everybody. This is an embarrassing spectacle. After 1995, 1993, whatever, I’m getting tired of it. I’m worn out. It’s history repeating itself over and over and over, almost verbatim, from “taking food out of the mouths of children,” to “they’re coming for our children” to “No meat inspectors!” They’re even saying have to close down the sleigh rides in Jellystone Park! That has come up again, like it did in the 1995 budget battle.


RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, for the first time in my life, I am ashamed of my country. To be watching all of this, to be treated like this, to have our common sense and intelligence insulted the way it’s being insulted? It just makes me ashamed. Seriously, man. Here we get worked up over $44 billion. That’s the total amount of money that will not be spent that was scheduled to be spent this year. In truth, we’re gonna spend more this year than we spent last year.

We’re just not gonna spend as much as was projected. It’s all baseline budgeting. There is no real cut below a baseline of zero. There just isn’t. Yet here they come, sucking us in, roping us in. Panic here, fear there: Crisis, destruction, no meat inspection, no cops, no teachers, no firefighters, no air traffic control. I’m sorry, my days of getting roped into all this are over. We have the media playing along with all this. The ruling class of both parties play along with all this. It’s insulting. I don’t know how else to describe it.

I’m into my 25th year.

I can’t tell you the number of times this has happened. This hit me yesterday. I’ve said the same things over and over for 25 years. Whether the Clinton presidency or the Obama presidency, whether it’s a Pelosi speakership or Tom Foley (who was speaker when I started), it’s the same stuff. It’s the same threats. It’s the same arguments over and over. Nothing ever changes! We just keep spending more money. We create more dependency, we get more and more irresponsible from one crisis to the next, all of them manufactured.

Except for the real crisis, which nobody ever addresses, and that is: We can’t afford any of this.

Obama is feeling his oats now that the election is behind him. He is going to plunge “forward” into his “fundamental transformation” of our United Sates of America.  The sooner he can get the remainder of his agenda accomplished then the sooner he will have destroyed the America he detests. Are we going to let him succeed?

“The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.”
– Thomas Jefferson

Serial Sociology: History of the Future

This entry was posted in American Culture, American Patriotism, American Sovereignty, Border Control, Communications, Communism, Conservatism, Cultural Marxism, Economy, Education, elitism, Fascism, Federal Budget, First Amendment, Founders, GOP, History, House of Representatives, Human Rights, Indoctrination, Legal/Judicial, Liberal Crap, Lies, Main-Stream Media, Marxian Philosophy, Marxism, Mental Illness, Monetary Policy, National Debt, Obama Lies, opinion, Plantation Liberalism, Political Theory, Politics, Progressive Movement, Rank Stupidity, Social Engineering, Socialism, Sovereignty, Taxation, Tea Party, Totalitarianism, U.S. Constitution, Uncategorized, Unemployment, Writing. Bookmark the permalink.