The Media Should Be Ashamed of Its Connecticut Coverage

What journalistic rationale could compel a reporter to interview young children at a mass-murder scene?

Satellite trucks in Treadwell Park, in Newtown, Conn., Dec. 15th, 2012. The town park has become a small village for press and media that have descended on the town following the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Friday. (Photo: Ned Gerard / Connecticut Post)

By Matt K. Lewis

It’s time to have a national conversation… about the media.

But first, let’s recount how they’ve blown the coverage of the tragic school shootings in Connecticut:

The media originally reported the wrong name of the alleged shooter. (The suspected killer was Ryan Lanza, they breathlessly reported. Turns out it was actually Ryan’s brother, Adam.) Then, some in the media advertised Ryan’s Facebook and Twitter page. (This, of course, brings to mind Brian Ross’ irresponsible and premature on-air suggestion over the summer that the Aurora shooter was a tea party member.)

As if those cases of egregiously mistaken identity weren’t enough, producers and reporters began trolling Twitter, seeking to proposition friends and relatives of the victims for an interview.

Meanwhile, others staked out the young survivors, and then proceeded to conduct on-air interviews with these young children. This was unseemly and superfluous. As TIME‘s James Poniewozik wrote, “There is no good journalistic reason to put a child at a mass-murder scene on live TV, permission of the parents or not.”

Read more at TheWeek.com

About Brent P.

Editor-in-Chief at TheRightPlanet.com, writer, tech editor, software engineer, web developer, graphic design, anti-Marxist, pro-American guitar shredding Glock owner.
This entry was posted in American Culture, Conservatism, Crime, Cultural Marxism, First Amendment, Legal/Judicial, Main-Stream Media, Marxism, Politics, Progressive Movement, Social Engineering, U.S. Constitution and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.