Plutocracy of the Damned (Part 2)

In this installment of “Plutocracy of the Damned,” we’ll take a look at the collusion of  Rothschild family with the Illuminati, and how the Rothschild clan went on to dominate the monarchies of Europe by establishing central banking and the practice of “fractional reserve lending.”

House of Rothschild (cont’d)

Mayer Amschel (M.A.) Rothschild fathered five sons. Interestingly, all five sons were eventually dispersed throughout Europe–Nathan to London, England; Amschel to Frankfurt, Germany; Salomon to Vienna, Austria; Carl to Naples, Italy; and James (Jacob) to Paris, France.

Following the Bavarian government’s edict outlawing the Illuminati sect and all secret societies in 1784, many Illuminati allegedly showed up in France as the Jacobins (Cloture de la Salle des Jacobins). Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orleans, a member of the French Grand Orient Lodge, financed the Jacobins to create an artificial food shortage, which fomented a revolt against the King and Queen of France. Conversely, there are scholars who claim the Illuminati had nothing to do with the French Revolution.

It was the Jacobins who allege Queen Marie Antoinette uttered the phrase “let them eat cake” in regard to the intentional famine created by Philippe II and the Jacobins. A bloodbath ensued … the French monarchy was beheaded … the Christian calendar was abolished … a ten-day work week was enforced. Some 300,000 people were killed during the French Revolution–all in the name of liberty, equality and fraternity. The first revolution was finished.

Three of the Rothschild brothers (Nathan, Salomon and James) were initiated into Freemasonry, as was a one Napoleon Bonaparte in 1798. Unfortunately, for Napoleon, Nathan Rothschild was transferring money from William I, Elector of Hesse, to his brother Amschel Rothschild to help fund the British Army, while James (Jacob) Rothschild funded Napoleon. This means the Rothschild’s were busy funding both sides of the war in 1812. The Rothschild’s have been funding both sides of every major war for the past two hundred years.

But the Rothschild’s consternation began to grow because Napoleon could not be contained. Napoleon eventually enthroned himself as King of France in September, 1804. Additionally, Napoleon ended the Roman Church-State and deposed the Pope. But the greatest sin Napoleon committed, as far as the Rothschild’s were concerned, was Napoleon’s creation of a debt-free currency (Banque de France)–a direct threat to the Rothschild Empire.

Napoleon printed his own interest-free currency, which the Rothschild’s saw as a direct threat to their financial dominance.

The Rothschild’s were eventually able to defeat Napoleon by financial dominance. Napoleon was forced to sell all French land holdings in America (cf. Louisiana Purchase) to help finance the war. The defeat of Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo spelled opportunity for the Rothschild clan. Leonard Ulrich writes:

“While the Battle of Waterloo was a defeat for Napoleon, it was an opportunity for financial dominance by the Rothschild’s. Because the Rothschild’s had a network of banking couriers throughout Europe, they were the only merchants who were allowed to pass through the English and French blockades. One of these couriers crossed the English Channel with the news that Wellington had won the war a full twenty-four hours before Wellington’s own courier. Nathan Rothschild knew that he was armed with this critical information before anyone else was. He ordered his workers to start selling holdings of British War Bonds. Other traders observed this false maneuver and started selling their bonds in a panic. The bonds became worthless, as everyone thought that Rothschild’s action meant that Napoleon had won the war. Nathan Rothschild then instructed his traders to buy all the British bonds they could get. When London heard the news the England won the war against Napoleon, British bonds gained a level of value even higher than before the war began. The ownership of such a vast sum of high-value bonds meant that the Rothschild’s literally owned the Bank of England.”

Interestingly, on November 28, 1912, the New York Times published an article about the Rothschild’s taking legal action in London to suppress a book covering Nathan Rothschild’s cunning financial scheme to buy up all the British consols (War Bonds) during the Battle of Waterloo. The judge blocked the injunction. The Rothschild’s dropped the case to avoid the inevitable public discourse that would result from a trial. It appears the Rothschild’s are quite sensitive to their methods being exposed; they remain well out of the public spotlight to this day–only a handful of Rothschild’s concerns brandish the Rothschild logo.

Furthermore, the Rothschild’s introduced the banking practice of fractional reserve lending–the magical ability to create money out of thin air–via their central banks that were spread throughout Europe.  The monarchies of Europe literally became indebted to the Rothschild Empire.  For all intents and purposes, the Rothschild’s own the Crown of England.

Congress of Vienna

Starting in September, 1814, the Congress of Vienna convened. The objective of the Congress was to settle the many issues arising from the French Revolutionary Wars, the Napoleonic Wars, and the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. It was the hope of the Rothschild’s at this time that a Euro-Confederation could be formed. Sound familiar? The Ramanov Dynasty rejected the treaty set forth at the Congress of Vienna, seeing it as an Illuminati takeover. The Rothchild’s ominously predicted that the Romanov Dynasty would eventually be destroyed.

Of note, was the Rothschild’s funding of the British in the American War of 1812. Ironically, M.A. Rothschild died in 1812.

The American Civil War


It is at this point in the timeline of America’s monetary history that this author’s blood begins to boil. The Rothschild’s were intent on reclaiming America and putting her back under the Crown–colonial rule. So, like in 1812, the Rothschild’s funded both sides of the Civil War. Although many fought for the end of slavery during the Civil War, the primary concern for Lincoln was the preservation of the Union as a hedge against the diabolical international bankers who were purposefully trying to split the U.S. in two. Lionel Rothschild, who was located in Britain, financed the North, while James de Rothschild (France) funded the South.

But much to the chagrin of the international banking cartel of the Rothschild’s, Lincoln created an interest-free currency–the “greenback”–to help finance the war, which I will explain more fully in the next installment.

Debt-Based Economy

When one studies the monetary and economic history of the United States, from its inception, it is readily apparent that a huge struggle between the titanic forces of the international bankers (i.e. Rothschild et al., central banking) and the citizens of the United States to control their own currency lives on to this day.

Before I continue, I want to interject a personal note: I have never agreed with all of our Founders all of the time. As a matter of fact, the more I study the history of our nation, the more human our Founders and Framers become–full of quirks and foibles, like anybody. But that does not in any way diminish their individual accomplishments to help establish the freest nation ever known. But in summation, as a patriotic American, I never agree with anybody all of the time, nor do I expect the same in return. But I digress.

In 1791, Alexander Hamilton formed the First Central Bank in America; it was a privately owned enterprise, which violates Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution–meaning, Congress shall have power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.

First National Bank of the United States

The American people began to rail against this sort of debt-based system. But none other than Nathan Rothschild exclaimed, “Either the application for renewal [U.S. Central Bank] is granted, or the U.S. will find itself in a disastrous war.” Five months later the British attacked–burnt down Washington, D.C.. But the British were tied up with the Napoleonic Wars and were unable to send additional reinforcements to finish the job. Although the U.S. won the war, severe economic hardship followed.

“If my sons did not want wars … there would be none.”

–Gutle Schnaper, wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Over and over again, in American history, we see what happens when we purchase our currency from a private corporation. Every note of currency we buy comes with debt pre-attached, yet we have see-sawed back and forth between debt-free currency and the debt-based rule of central banks for our entire history as a nation. And there’s a damn good reason, too … one need look no farther than the Rothschild’s for an example of how fractional reserve banking only benefits the one who is employing the tactic. It is truly diabolical and the Rothschild’s of the world know it! Ka-Ching!

It is fascinating to learn, at least in my opinion, that there has only been a handful of times in our history that we have abolished a debt-based currency … Benjamin Franklin did it … Abraham Lincoln did it … Thomas Jefferson tried to. What is equally fascinating is the fact that anybody, of any import, who has attempted to implement an interest-free, debt-free currency, anywhere on earth, has been viciously attacked by the central bankers of the world. By the way, the Rothschild’s control about half of the wealth of the entire world! Apparently, they would like to rule the world. Besides, as far as they’re concerned, they’re so much smarter and better–never mind all those horrible wars.

In part 3 of “Plutocracy of the Damned,” we will continue to explore the diabolical influence of central banking in our nation’s history and how the forces of debt-based economy love to keep us all in chains–neo-feudalism. We will also explore solutions to our current economic disaster.


About Brent Parrish

Author, blogger, editor, researcher, graphic artist, software engineer, carpenter, woodworker, guitar shredder and a strict constitutionalist. Member of the Watcher's Council and the Qatar Awareness Campaign. I believe in individual rights, limited government, fiscal responsibility and a strong defense. ONE WORD: FREEDOM!
This entry was posted in Afghanistan, American Culture, American Patriotism, American Sovereignty, Communications, Communism, Conservatism, Cultural Marxism, Debt Ceiling, Economy, elitism, Energy Policy, EPA, Federal Budget, First Amendment, Foreign Policy, GOP, Health Care Bill, Horn of Africa, House of Representatives, Iraq, Legal/Judicial, Libya, Main-Stream Media, Marxism, Mob Action, Monetary Policy, National Debt, National Security, Political Theory, Prejudice, Presidential Campaign, Progressive Movement, Revolutionary War, Senate, Social Engineering, Social Justice, Socialism, Taxation, Tea Party, Totalitarianism, U.S. Constitution, Unemployment, Union Actions, War, Yemen. Bookmark the permalink.